In Bohr model of hydrogen atom, the force on the electron depends on the principal quantum number as
In Bohr model of hydrogen atom, the force on the electron depends on the principal quantum number as
- A
$F \propto 1/{n^3}$
- B
$F \propto 1/{n^4}$
- C
$F \propto 1/{n^5}$
- D
Does not depend on $n$
Similar Questions
Ratio of longest wavelengths corresponding to Lyman and Balmer series in hydrogen spectrum is
Ratio of longest wavelengths corresponding to Lyman and Balmer series in hydrogen spectrum is
An $\alpha$- particle of $5\ MeV$ energy strikes with a nucleus of uranium at stationary at an scattering angle of $180^o$. The nearest distance upto which $\alpha$- particle reaches the nucleus will be of the order of
An $\alpha$- particle of $5\ MeV$ energy strikes with a nucleus of uranium at stationary at an scattering angle of $180^o$. The nearest distance upto which $\alpha$- particle reaches the nucleus will be of the order of
- [IIT 1981]
Explain Rutherford's argument for scattered $\alpha $ -particles.
Explain Rutherford's argument for scattered $\alpha $ -particles.
The number of completely filled shells for the element ${ }_{16} S ^{32}$ is
The number of completely filled shells for the element ${ }_{16} S ^{32}$ is
- [KVPY 2017]
Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of $\alpha$ -particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$ ) predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t,$ the number of $\alpha$ -particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin foil?
Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of $\alpha$ -particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$ ) predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t,$ the number of $\alpha$ -particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin foil?