What was the thickness of the gold foil kept in the Geiger-Marsden scattering experiment?
What was the thickness of the gold foil kept in the Geiger-Marsden scattering experiment?
Similar Questions
Energy levels $A, B, C$ of a certain atom correspond to increasing values of energy i.e., $E_A < E_B < E_C$. If ${\lambda _1},{\lambda _2},{\lambda _3}$ are the wavelengths of radiation corresponding to the transition $C$ to $B, B$ to $A$ and $C$ to $A$ respectively, which of the following relation is correct ?
Energy levels $A, B, C$ of a certain atom correspond to increasing values of energy i.e., $E_A < E_B < E_C$. If ${\lambda _1},{\lambda _2},{\lambda _3}$ are the wavelengths of radiation corresponding to the transition $C$ to $B, B$ to $A$ and $C$ to $A$ respectively, which of the following relation is correct ?
Electrons with de-Broglie wavelength $\lambda $ fall on the target an $X-$ ray tube. The cut off wavelength of emitted $X-$ ray is
Electrons with de-Broglie wavelength $\lambda $ fall on the target an $X-$ ray tube. The cut off wavelength of emitted $X-$ ray is
If the potential difference applied across $X-$ ray tube is $V$ volts, then approximately minimum wavelength of the emitted $X-$ rays will be
In gold foil experiment number of deflected $\alpha -$ particles at angle $90^o$ is $63$ than number of $\alpha -$ particle deflected at $120^o$ is
In gold foil experiment number of deflected $\alpha -$ particles at angle $90^o$ is $63$ than number of $\alpha -$ particle deflected at $120^o$ is
Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom $\left(\sim 10^{-10} \;m \right)$
$(a)$ Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants $e, m_{e},$ and $c .$ Determine its numerical value.
$(b)$ You will find that the length obtained in $(a)$ is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves $c .$ But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domain where $c$ is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard $c$ and look for 'something else' to get the right atomic size. Now, the Planck's constant $h$ had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr's great insight lay in recognising that $h, m_{e},$ and $e$ will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from $h m_e$, and $e$ and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.
Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom $\left(\sim 10^{-10} \;m \right)$
$(a)$ Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants $e, m_{e},$ and $c .$ Determine its numerical value.
$(b)$ You will find that the length obtained in $(a)$ is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves $c .$ But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domain where $c$ is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard $c$ and look for 'something else' to get the right atomic size. Now, the Planck's constant $h$ had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr's great insight lay in recognising that $h, m_{e},$ and $e$ will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from $h m_e$, and $e$ and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.