The evolutionary story of moths in England during industrialisation reveals, that 'evolution is apparently reversible'. Clarify this statement.
In $1850s$, i.e., before industrialisation it was observed that there were more white-winged peppered moths (Bistonbetularia) on trees than dark-winged or melanised moths (Bistonca-rbonaria).
$\Rightarrow$ However, when the collection carried out from the same area, but after industrialisation, i.e., in $1920$, there were more dark-winged moths in the same area, i.e., the proportion was reversed.
Before industrialisation set in, thick growth of almost white-coloured lichen covered the trees-in that background the white winged moth survived but the dark-coloured moth were picked out by predators.
$\Rightarrow \quad$ Lichens can be used as industrial pollution indicators.
$\Rightarrow$ They will not grow in areas that are polluted.
$\Rightarrow$ During post-industrialisation period, the tree trunks became dark due to industrial smoke and soots.
$\Rightarrow$ Under this condition the white-winged moth did not survive due to predators, dark-winged or melanised moth survived.
$\Rightarrow$ Hence, moths that were able to camouflage themselves, i.e., hide in the background, survived.
$\cdots$ This understanding is supported by the fact that in areas where industrialisation did not occur, e.g., in rural areas, the count of melanic moths was low.
- This showed that in a mixed population, those that can better-adapt, survive and increase in population size
Which of the following are the correct pair of homologous organs?
$I.$ Hands of man and wings of bat
$II.$ Wings of bat and wings of cockroach
$III.$ Wings of bird and wings of butterfly
$IV.$ Fins of fish and forelimbs of horse
$V.$ Forearm of human and forelimbs of horse
The correct combination is visible in option
$A$ : During industrialisation dark-winged or melanised moths were more abundant.
$R$ : They were able to camouflage themselves, hide in the background and survived.
Anthropogenic actions that leads to evolution isthe use of
It is not an example of convergent evolution
How do we compute the age of a fossil ?