Recall the experiments done by Frederick Griffith,Avery,MacLeod,and McCarty,where $DNA$ was speculated to be the genetic material. If $RNA$,instead of $DNA$,was the genetic material,would the heat-killed strain of $Pneumococcus$ have transformed the $R$-strain into a virulent strain? Explain.

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) $RNA$ is chemically more labile and prone to degradation compared to $DNA$ due to the presence of the $2'-OH$ group in its ribose sugar.
Furthermore,$RNA$ is highly susceptible to enzymatic degradation by ribonucleases,which are ubiquitous in the environment.
Therefore,if $RNA$ were the genetic material,the heat-killed $S$-strain would likely have been degraded during the experimental process and would not have retained its ability to transform the $R$-strain into a virulent form.

Explore More

Similar Questions

Which scientist is associated with the term 'Nuclein'?

The unequivocal proof that $DNA$ is the genetic material was given by whom?

$DNA$,present in the nucleus,was named as 'Nuclein' by

Who revealed the biochemical nature of the transforming principle? How was it done?

Which enzymes were used by Avery,MacLeod,and McCarty in their experiment to determine the transforming principle?

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo