A uniformly charged solid sphere of radius $R$ has potential $V_0$ (measured with respect to $\infty$) on its surface. For this sphere the equipotential surfaces with potentials $\frac{{3{V_0}}}{2},\;\frac{{5{V_0}}}{4},\;\frac{{3{V_0}}}{4}$ and $\frac{{{V_0}}}{4}$ have rasius $R_1,R_2,R_3$ and $R_4$ respectively. Then
$R_1$$ \ne 0$ and $(R_2-R_1) > (R_4-R_3)$
$R_1$ $ = 0$ and $R_2 < (R_4-R_3)$
$2R < R_4$
$R_1$ $ = 0$ and $ R_2 > (R_4-R_3)$
The angle between the electric lines of force and the equipotential surface is
A point charge $+Q$ is placed just outside an imaginary hemispherical surface of radius $R$ as shown in the figure. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
(IMAGE)
$[A]$ The electric flux passing through the curved surface of the hemisphere is $-\frac{\mathrm{Q}}{2 \varepsilon_0}\left(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)$
$[B]$ Total flux through the curved and the flat surfaces is $\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}$
$[C]$ The component of the electric field normal to the flat surface is constant over the surface
$[D]$ The circumference of the flat surface is an equipotential
Define an equipotential surface.
Three equal charges are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle. Which of the graphs below correctly depicts the equally-spaced equipotential surfaces in the plane of the triangle? (All graphs have the same scale.)
Figure shows a set of equipotential surfaces. The magnitude and direction of electric field that exists in the region is .........