Which one of the following cannot be explaine | vedclass

Name: PDF Generator App | JEE NEET Paper Generator | Vedclass
Brand: Vedclass
Rating: 5 (35 reviews)

Question

(c) : According to Mendel&rsquo;s law of dominance, in heterozygous individuals a character is represented by two contrasting factors called alleles o

Vedclass · Accepted Answer

Alleles do not show any blending and both the characters recover as such in $F_2$ generation.

Vedclass · Answer

(c) : According to Mendel&rsquo;s law of dominance, in heterozygous individuals a character is represented by two contrasting factors called alleles or allelomorphs which occur in pairs. Out of the two contrasting alleles, onlyone is able to express its effect in the individual. It is called dominant factor or dominant allele. The other allele which does not show its effect in the heterozygous individual is called recessive factor or recessive allele. The option $(c)$ in the given question cannot be explained on the basis of law of dominance. It can only be explained on the basis of Mendel&rsquo;s law of independent assortment, according to which in a dihybrid cross, the two alleles of each character assort independently (do not show any blending) of the alleles of other character and separate at the time of gamete formation. Both the characters are recovered as such in $F_2$ generation producing both parental and new combinations oftraits.

Which one of the following cannot be explained on the basis of Mendel’s law of dominance?

Similar Questions

In a monohybrid cross when $F‌‌_1$ is crossed with homozygous dominant parent then which type of offsprings will obtain

Organisms phenotypically similar but genotypically different are said to be

Which of the following law was discovered first by Mendel?

For the expression of traits genes provide only the potentiality and the environment provides the opportunity. Comment on the veracity of the statement.

Variation stands for differences in traits of progenies from