The contrapositive of statement 'If Jaipur is capital of Rajasthan, then Jaipur is in India' is
Jaipur is not in India or Jaipur is not capital of Rajasthan.
If Jaipur is not in India, then Jaipur is not capital of Rajasthan
Jaipur is not in India and Jaipur is not capital of Rajasthan.
If Jaipur is not capital of Rajasthan, then Jaipur is not in India
Which of the following statements is $NOT$ logically equivalent to $\left( {p \to \sim p} \right) \to \left( {p \to q} \right)$?
If the Boolean expression $( p \Rightarrow q ) \Leftrightarrow( q *(\sim p ))$ is a tautology, then the Boolean expression $p *(\sim q )$ is equivalent to
Consider
Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy.
Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p )$ is a tautology.
The contrapositive of the statement “If you are born in India, then you are a citizen of India”, is
If $p , q$ and $r$ are three propositions, then which of the following combination of truth values of $p , q$ and $r$ makes the logical expression $\{(p \vee q) \wedge((\sim p) \vee r)\} \rightarrow((\sim q) \vee r)$ false ?