Consider

Statement -1 :left( {p wedge | vedclass

Name: PDF Generator App | JEE NEET Paper Generator | Vedclass
Brand: Vedclass
Rating: 5 (35 reviews)

Question

Statement-ll: $\quad(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(\sim q \rightarrow-p)$

$\equiv(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(p \rightarrow q)$

which is

Vedclass · Accepted Answer

Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement $-1$

Vedclass · Answer

Statement-ll: $\quad(p ightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(\sim q ightarrow-p)$

$\equiv(p ightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(p ightarrow q)$

which is always true

so statement- -II is true

$ 	ext { Statement-l: } (p \wedge \sim q) \wedge(\sim p \wedge q)$

$=p \wedge \sim q \wedge \sim p \wedge q $

$=p \wedge \sim p \wedge \sim q \wedge q $

$=f \wedge f $

$=f $

so statement- - is true

Alternate

Statement-ll: $\quad(p ightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(\sim q ightarrow \sim p)$

$\sim \mathrm{q} ightarrow \sim \mathrm{p}$ is contrapositive

of $p ightarrow q$ hence $(p ightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(p ightarrow q)$

will be a tautology

statement-ll $\quad(p \wedge \sim q) \wedge(\sim p \wedge q)$

Consider

Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy.

Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p )$ is a tautology.

Similar Questions

If $p , q$ and $r$ are three propositions, then which of the following combination of truth values of $p , q$ and $r$ makes the logical expression $\{(p \vee q) \wedge((\sim p) \vee r)\} \rightarrow((\sim q) \vee r)$ false ?

Consider the following three statements :

$(A)$ If $3+3=7$ then $4+3=8$.

$(B)$ If $5+3=8$ then earth is flat.

$(C)$ If both $(A)$ and $(B)$ are true then $5+6=17$. Then, which of the following statements is correct?

Negation of statement "If I will go to college, then I will be an engineer" is -

Consider the following statements:

$P :$ Ramu is intelligent

$Q $: Ramu is rich

$R:$ Ramu is not honest

The negation of the statement "Ramu is intelligent and honest if and only if Ramu is not rich" can be expressed as.

Statement $-1$ : $ \sim \left( {p \leftrightarrow \, \sim q} \right)$ is equivalent to $p \leftrightarrow q$

Statement $-2$ : $ \sim \left( {p \leftrightarrow \, \sim q} \right)$ is a tautology.

Consider Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy. Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p )$ is a tautology.